RAJESH TANDON
SURENDRA KUMAR ANAND – Appellant
Versus
A D J /ET C VIITH DEHRADUN – Respondent
2. By the present writ petition the petitioner has prayed for a writ of cer-tiorari quashing the order dated 28-03-2006 passed by the respondent no. 1 (Annexure-7 to the writ petition ).
3. Briefly stated, according to the case of the petitioner, respondent no. 2 / Kishan Lal Arora is owner of House No. 61, Lunia Mohalla, Dehradun, of which the petitioner is the tenant 6f a part, which consists of two rooms, bath room and Kitchen.
4. Briefly stated, a suit before the Small Causes Court being Suit No. 3 of 1993 Kishan Lal Arora Vs. Surendra Kumar Anand was filed before the Judge Small Causes Court, Dehradun claiming the arrear of rent under Section 20 (2) (a) of the U. P. Act No. XIII of 1972 since April, 1987.
5. Respondent no. 3 has submitted that the petitioner/tenant had stopped the payment of rent since 1987, hence on 07-12-1992 a notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act was sent to the petitioner, which was served upon the tenant on 11-12-1992. The details of the description of arrears, which were claimed by the
Mohd. Tayyab Vs. ADJ (E.C. Act), Dehradun
Hari Shankar and others v. Rao Girdhari Lal Chaudhary
Malini Ayappa Naicker v. Seth Manghraj Udhavdas
Rafat Ali v. Sugni Bai and others
Ranjeet Singh Vs. Ravi Prakash
Dalmia Jain Airways Ltd. V. Sukumar Mukherjee
Om Prakash and others v. IInd Additional District Judge, Saharanpur
State of Kerala v. K.M.C. Abdullah and Company
M/s. India Pipe Fitting Co. V. Fakruddin M.A. Baker and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.