SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 192

B.S.CHAUHAN, DILIP GUPTA
Vijay Prakash – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
L.D.Rajbhar,

B. S. CHAUHAN, J.

( 1 ) THE special appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 23. 12. 2004 of the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition of the petitioner for issuing direction to treat the petitioner as belonging to members of Scheduled Caste being a member of bhar/rajbhar community.

( 2 ) THE facts and circumstances giving rise to this case are that the petitioner/appellant belongs to bhar/rajbhar caste, which falls in the category of Denotified Tribe (Vimukti Jati ). Persons belonging to Bhar and Rajbhar communities of the district Azamgarh, in the State of Uttar pradesh, had earlier been notified under the provisions of Criminal Tribes Act 1924 (hereinafter called the Act 1924 ). The Act 1924 stood repealed in 1952 and all the communities included in the schedule thereof stood de-notified, and certain benefits have been given to them, for example, making certain reservations of the seats in educational institutions. The petition was filed for issuing direction to the respondents to treat the petitioner/appellant belonging to scheduled Tribes and confer upon him the benefit of reservation available to Scheduled Tribes candidates for the purpose of admi































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top