RAKESH SHARMA
Rajesh Kumar Shukla – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
( 1 ) HEARD Sri Subhash Chandra Pandey, learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned standing Counsel appearing for opposite parties.
( 2 ) SINCE the common question of law is involved in these writ petitions, the same are being disposed off by a common judgment,
( 3 ) UNDER challenge are several orders Issued against the petitioners, terminating their temporary services from the post of Junior Clerks who were working in Regional District Offices and Audit offices of Cooperative Societies and Panchayats in U. P. The orders of termination have been issued by the Regional Audit Officers, Cooperative Societies and Panchayats in compliance of the directions issued by the Chief Audit Officer, Cooperative Societies and Panchayats, U. P. , station Road, Lucknow vide order dated 12. 8. 1994. These orders of termination which were issued against the petitioners, terminating their services have been assailed in this bunch of writ petitions.
( 4 ) THIS Court while entertaining the writ petitions on 27. 9. 1994 had been pleased to stay the operation of the impugned order, dated 12. 8. 1994 passed by the Chief Audit Officer and panchayats, U. P. , directing the subordina
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.