SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 755

AJOY NATH RAY, ASHOK BHUSHAN
Shyam Bihari, Paras Nath Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
M.B.Jain, Rahul Jain, Raj Kumar Jain,

AJOY NATH RAY, C. J. , ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Sri Raj Kumar Jain, learned Senior Advocate, appearing for the appellant.

( 2 ) THIS appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 23rd February, 2005 passed by Honble Mr. Justice Tarun Agarwal dismissing the writ petition on merit.

( 3 ) THE appellant tiled the writ petition challenging the appellate order passed by Deputy inspector General of Police under the provisions of Uttar Pradesh Police Officers of the subordinate Ranks Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) as well as the revisional order passed by Inspector General of Police under the Rules. The Rules have been framed under the Police Act, 1861. This special appeal has been filed under Chapter viii Rule 5 of the Rules of the Court. The question first to be considered is as to whether this appeal is barred under Chapter VIII Rule 5 of the Rules of the Court ?

( 4 ) CHAPTER VIII Rule 5 of the Rules of the Court is extracted below:5. Special appeal.- An appeal shall lie to the Court from a judgment (not being a judgment passed in the exercise of appellate jurisdiction in respect of a decree or order made by a Court subject to









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top