SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 1462

AJOY NATH RAY, ASHOK BHUSHAN
Rishipal Kunwar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
C.B.Yadav, H.N.TRIPATHI, P.N.Rai, Rajesh Tripathi, V.P.MATHUR,

AJOY NATH RAY, C. J. , ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.

( 1 ) THESE are the two writ petitions filed as public interest litigations on same facts and cause of action. Both writ petitions being identical in nature are decided by this common order.

( 2 ) IT is sufficient to mention the facts of writ petition No. 52247 of 2005 for deciding both the writ petitions. Writ Petition No. 52247 of 2005 has been filed by five petitioners claiming themselves to be residents of Block Bisarakh Tehsil Dadri. The case of the petitioners in the writ petition is that 81 villages are covered by U. P. Industrial Area Development Act 1976 (hereinafter referred to as Act) and by virtue of Section 12-A of U. P. Industrial Area development Act 1976, no election for constituting Panchayats in the said Villages can take place. A mandamus has been prayed directing the respondents not to hold proposed election of panchayat in respect of 81 villages which was acquired by the authority. In the supplementary affidavit filed in Writ Petition No. 52247 of 2005 petitioners, have brought on the record copy of the notification dated 11. 7. 1989 issued in exercise of power under Section 2 (d) of U. P. Industrial area Development Act,











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top