SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 2177

Naresh Chandra Sharma son of Late Uma Dutt Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. through Secretary (Revenue) and District Magistrate – Respondent


Advocates:
M.D.Singh Shekar, PUSHPENDRA SINGH,

ARUN TANDON, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Shri M. D. Singh shekhar on behalf of the petitioner, Standing Counsel on behalf of respondents.

( 2 ) THIS writ petition is directed against an order dated 12. 1. 2004 passed by the District magistrate, Ghaziabad (the appointing authority of the petitioner) in exercise of powers under fundamental Rules 56 (C) as contained in final in book Vol. 2 part 2 to 4 as amended upto date, compulsorily retiring the petitioner from service w. e. f. the date of the order.

( 3 ) ON behalf of the petitioner it has been stated that except for adverse entries awarded for the year 2000-01 and of the year 2002-03 against which Appeals filed by the petitioner were pending consideration, all other annual entries of the petitioner were utkarsh or ati Uttam. It is therefore, submitted that the petitioner cannot be termed as a dead wood to be chopped of before he attains the age of superannjation nor can it be said that it is in public interest to retire the petitioner. It is stated that me adverse entries of the year 2000-01 and 2002-03 cannot be taken into consideration as the statutory appeals against the aforesaid entries were pending consideration. In the alternative it is





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top