ASHOK BHUSHAN, NAHEED ARA MOONIS
SANJEEV AGRAWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Re : C.M. Impleadment Application No. 157952 of 2011.
By the Court.—This is an application filed by Prasant Johary and others praying for impleadment in the writ petition.
2. The writ petition has been filed against the order dated 25th February, 2011 removing the petitioner from the office of the President of Nagar Palika Parishad, Bulandshahr. The applicants claim to be corporators of the Municipal Board. We have permitted the applicants to be heard in the writ petition under the Rules of the Court, however, no formal impleadment of the applicants is necessary.
3. The application is disposed of accordingly.
Decided Accordingly.
Re : C.M.W.P. No. 16029 of 2011.
Hon’ble Ashok Bhushan, J.—Heard Sri Ravi Kiran Jain, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Seema Agrawal for the petitioner and Sri S.G. Hasnain, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the State-respondents. Sri Shashi Nandan, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri S.M. Fazal has been heard on behalf of Prasant Johary and others who have filed application for impleadment in the writ petition.
2. By this writ petition, the petitioner, elected President of the Nagar Palika Parishad, Bulandshahr, has challenged the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.