RAN VIJAI SINGH, VINEET SARAN
LAL SHARAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
By the Court.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents and have perused the record. Pleadings have been exchanged and with consent of the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being disposed of at the admission stage.
2. The case of the petitioner is that he has retired from service as Executive Engineer, Irrigation Department of the State Government on 31.7.2010. It is contended that after retirement, though the petitioner has been paid certain amount like leave encashment etc., but pension and other retiral dues have not been paid merely on the ground of a communication dated 2.8.2010 made by the Commissioner, Allahabad Division, Allahabad to the State Government which was with regard to non-utilization of certain funds (not mis-utilization of funds) by the petitioner under some Government scheme. On such ground, it was stated in the said letter that retiral dues be not paid to the petitioner. Challenging the said action of the respondents in not paying the pension and other retiral dues, this writ petition has been filed. A further prayer has also been made to quash the communication date
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.