SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(All) 2209

RAN VIJAI SINGH, VINEET SARAN
LAL SHARAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Ashwani Kumar Mishra for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents and have perused the record. Pleadings have been exchanged and with consent of the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being disposed of at the admission stage.

2. The case of the petitioner is that he has retired from service as Executive Engineer, Irrigation Department of the State Government on 31.7.2010. It is contended that after retirement, though the petitioner has been paid certain amount like leave encashment etc., but pension and other retiral dues have not been paid merely on the ground of a communication dated 2.8.2010 made by the Commissioner, Allahabad Division, Allahabad to the State Government which was with regard to non-utilization of certain funds (not mis-utilization of funds) by the petitioner under some Government scheme. On such ground, it was stated in the said letter that retiral dues be not paid to the petitioner. Challenging the said action of the respondents in not paying the pension and other retiral dues, this writ petition has been filed. A further prayer has also been made to quash the communication date































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top