SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(All) 2964

SUDHIR AGARWAL
ARVIND KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.P. Shukla for the Petitioner; C.S.C. and Pankaj Rai for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.—This writ petition is directed against order dated 10.8.2009 passed by District Magistrate, Allahabad cancelling fire-arm licence of petitioner on the ground that he has not given correct information in his application inasmuch as at Item Nos. 5 and 6 of the application, i.e., information relating to current and permanent address, the petitioner has disclosed same address in both columns, namely, 224/18 C Beniganj, Post G.T.B. Nagar, P.S. Kareli, Allahabad whereas his permanent address is Village Makdoompur (Doksaha), P.S. and District Kaushambi and, therefore, he is guilty of contravening Rule 51 which is punishable under Section 30 of Arms Act for giving wrong information and as such his application is liable to be rejected.

2. The said order has been confirmed in appeal by Commissioner vide order dated 15.2.2011.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he is presently residing at 224/18 C Beniganj, Post G.T.B. Nagar, P.S. Kareli, Allahabad and has been issued a driving licence, ration card as well as domicile certificate and, therefore, address given by him satisfies the requirement of “permanent address” and his application ought

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top