Hon’ble Prakash Krishna, J.—Both these revisions were heard together and are being disposed of by a common judgment as common questions of law and facts are involved.

2. Civil Revision No. 376 of 2008 was treated by the learned counsel for the parties as lead case and the arguments were advanced with reference to the facts of that case and was understood that the same will hold good also in the connected civil revision.

3. Both these revisions are directed against the orders dated 13th of August, 2008 passed separately in two SCC Suit Nos. 11 of 2006 and 12 of 2006.

4. The revision No. 376 of 2008 arises out of original suit No. 12 of 2006.

5. The aforestated two suits have been instituted by the applicants herein against the defendant opposite parties for recovery of arrears of rent and ejectment. The plaintiff is owner and landlord of factory on plot No. B-27, Sector-3 NOIDA measuring 788.54 Sq. Meters. On 1st of June, 2000 it was given on rent to M/s. Swastik Udyog and to its sister concern namely M/s. Dharam Pal Satya Pal and Ridhi Sidhi Logistic. It was agreed upon that M/s. Dharam Pal Satyapal will pay Rs. 39,000/- per month as rent while Swastik Udyog will pay Rs. 1