SYED RAFAT ALAM, KRISHNA MURARI
SATYENDRA KUMAR PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
By the Court.—This intra Court appeal filed under the Rules of the Court is preferred against the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge dated 28th July, 2011 dismissing the petitioner-appellant’s writ petition in limine on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction.
2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. The relevant facts of the case as stated in the writ petition are as under :
4. The petitioner-appellant was an applicant for the post of Sub-Inspector in the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) in pursuance to an advertisement issued in the year 2001. After being successful in the written examination as well as physical and medical examination and interview, he was issued appointment letter dated 9.11.2010 directing him to report for training at National Industrial Security Academy, Hyderabad. The appointment order was accompanied with copy of attestation form and questionnaire requiring him to disclose whether he has ever been convicted by any Court of law or any other judicial institution or is there any case pending in any Court of law and has any FIR been lodged and the case is pending and whether any FIR was ever lodged in the past. The
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.