SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 1005

SUDHIR AGARWAL
REKHA – Appellant
Versus
VEERMATI – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Ratnakar Upadhyaya for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.—This writ petition is directed against the order dated 13.1.2012 passed by District Judge, Baghpat whereby objection with regard to defect in election petition on account of non-compliance of Section 80 C.P.C. has been rejected.

2. Besides that election petition is not defective for non-compliance of Section 80 C.P.C., this Court is also of the view that such objection cannot be raised at the instance of a private party if State has not taken such an objection.

3. This issue has been considered by a Special Bench of this Court in Sunni Central Board of Waqfs v. Sri Gopal Singh Visharad and others, 2010 ADJ 1 (SFB) (LB) and in the judgment delivered by myself (concurred by Hon’ble S.U. Khan, J. on this issue), it has been said:

“622. Now we come to the second part of this issue i.e. 10 (b). The legislative intent of Section 80 is to give the Government sufficient notice of the suit which is proposed to be filed against it so that it may reconsider the decision and decide for itself whether the claim made could be accepted or not. The object of the section is advancement of justice and securing public good by avoidance of unnecessary litigation (Bih




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top