SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 2763

PANKAJ NAQVI
ABHA SAXENA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Atul Kumar and P.K. Srivastava for the Petitioner; C.S.C. and Subhash Ghosh for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Pankaj Naqvi, J.—Heard Shri Ashok Khare, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Praveen Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner; learned standing counsel for the State respondents and Shri Subhash Ghosh, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 5 and 6.

2. By means of the present petition, the petitioner essentially challenges an order of termination dated 23.10.2003 passed by respondent No. 5 whereby her services have been sought to be terminated.

3. The facts, as stated in the petition, are that in the city of Kanpur there is a minority institution, known as Kumari Udyan Girls Inter College, Ashok Nagar, Kanpur (for short ‘the institution’), to which the provisions of U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 (hereinafter to as the ‘Act’) are applicable. The petitioner was appointed as a teacher on 1.7.1991. As the husband of the petitioner was assigned a foreign job in Nigeria, it impelled the petitioner to avail leave without pay, from 1.12.1999 to 31.3.2001 (sanctioned leave). She applied afresh for further leave on 23.1.2001 for the period 1.4.2001 to 31.3.2002 (sanctioned leave). She again applied for leave without pay on 24.5.2001 for the period 1.4.200





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top