SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(All) 190

MALIK, V. BHARGAVA, H. S. CHATURVEDI
ABDUL HAMID – Appellant
Versus
FATIMA BEGUM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Farooq Hasan, Niamatullah, D.P. Khare

JUDGMENT

Malik, CJ.

[1] This case was referred to a Full Bench by a learned single Judge as he considered that the point of law that arose for decision was sufficiently important to need an authoritative pronouncement.

[2] This second appeal was filed by the defendant against a decree passed by the Civil Judge of Lucknow confirming a decision of the Munsif decreeing the plaintiff's suit for ejectment of the defendant from certain premises situate in Luck-now. The learned Munsif had granted to the defendant one month's time to vacate the premises and had directed that he should pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs. 26/4/- as rent for this period. It is not disputed that the defendant is plaintiff's tenant. The defence is that the plain- tiff could not file the suit as the plaintiff had not obtained the permission of the District Magistrate to file the suit and grounds (a) to (f) of Section 3 of the U. P. (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act (3 of 1947) did not exist.

[3] The plaintiff, Srimati Fatima Begum, had applied under Section 3 of the Act on -15-1-1949, to the District Magistrate for permission to file a suit for ejectment of the defendant. On 27-2-1948, the District Magist

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top