SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(All) 334

MALIK, SAPRU
ZAHID HUSSAIN – Appellant
Versus
B. KHAIRATI LAL JAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J. Swarup, Harish Chandra Sharma, S.B.L. Gaur, M.A. Kazmi

JUDGMENT

Malik, CJ.

[1] This is an appeal under Section 75 of the Provincial Insolvency Act (Act No. V of 1920), A creditor Khairati Lal applied on the 30th July, 1931, that Sh. Zahid Husain be adjudicated an insolvent. On the 14th November, 1931, an order of adjudication was passed. The creditors were all paid up in full and on the 10th March, 1948, the insolvent was discharged. A sum of Rs. 22,000, however, after payment of all the debts in full, remained in the hands of the Official Receiver and the creditors claimed that interest from the date of adjudication at the rate of 6 per cent. per annum might be allowed to them in accordance with the provisions of Section 48 of the Act. The creditors also claimed that prior to the date of adjudication they should be given interest at the contractual rate.

[2] The learned Insolvency Judge granted the request that interest at 6 per cent. per annum should be allowed from the date of adjudication. As a matter of fact, he had no option in the matter as the provisions of section 61 (6) were mandatory.

[3] As regards interest prior to the date of adjudication, he did not allow any interest to Ruqayya Khatoon, the wife of the insolvent, who had c





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top