SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 3096

P.K.S.BAGHEL
SANJAY RAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Ashok Khare, Sunil Kumar Srivastava and Siddharth Khare for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble P.K.S. Baghel, J.—The petitioner has preferred this writ petition for the issuance of a writ of mandamus or direction upon the respondent to grant him admission in Special B.T.C. Training Course, 2007.

2. Shorn off unnecessary details, the brief facts of the case are that the State Government issued an order dated 10.7.2007 which was modified on 13.7.2007 to provide Special B.T.C. Training to the B.Ed. degree holders. In compliance of the aforesaid Government Order the Principal of each District Institute of Education and Training issued advertisements inviting the applications from the eligible candidates for admission to Special B.T.C. Training Course, 2007. A copy of the said advertisement is placed on record by petitioner as annexure -6 to the writ petition.

3. In pursuance of the said advertisement, it is stated that the petitioner submitted his applications in District Gorakhpur, Maharajganj and Sant Kabir Nagar. It is stated that alongwith the application form, the petitioner had submitted his statement of marks of different educational qualifications. The petitioner has collectively enclosed all the statement of marks as annexure-8 to the writ petition.

4. I
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top