SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(All) 181

MALIK, V. BHARGAVA
M. R. Bakshi – Appellant
Versus
K. N. Saksena, P. C. S. , Regional Food Controller – Respondent


Advocates:
S.B. Johari, for Applicant.

Judgement

MALIK, CJ :- This is an application on behalf of M.R. Bakshi who was a Supply Inspector in Budaun. His services were temporary as were those of most other persons in the Supply Department the services being terminable after one months notice. On 18-5-1953, the Regional Food Controller, Lucknow, served a notice on the applicant in these terms :

"The services of Sri M.R. Bakshi, Foodgrains Inspector, Kashipur, are no longer required. He is hereby served with one months notice of termination of services with immediate effect."

2. Learned counsel has urged that though the notice purported to be a notice terminating the applicants services on the ground that the services were no longer required the real reason for the termination of the service was that there were certain complaints of misconduct against the applicant. Our attention was drawn to appendix 4 of the affidavit and it was said that the termination of service by notice was a device adopted to avoid the necessity of proving misconduct to entitle the opposite party to dismiss the applicant and the termination of service by notice, therefore, really amounted to an order of dismissal.

3. There are two objections to the acc



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top