SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(All) 218

MALIK, JAMES
Salik Ram Upadhia – Appellant
Versus
B. Jai Gopal Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
N.D. Pant and S.K. Verma, for Appellant; Vishwanath Singh, for Respondent.

Judgement

MALIK, CJ.:- This is an appeal on behalf of the defendant-appellant against a decree passed by the learned Civil Judge of Sultanpur. The points raised in the case were not very difficult but the learned Judge got lost in the number of authorities that were cited before him and appears to have come to an entirely erroneous conclusion.

2. On Thakur Rudra Pratap Singh, Taluqdar of Rampur, had borrowed a sum of money from one Salik Ram on 10-5-1932. Thakur Rudra Pratap Singh died issueless on 3-5-1933. He, however, left a widow surviving him, named Thakurain Sri Nath Kuar. On 14-10-1930, he executed a will which contained the following provision about his wife if he died issueless:

"That Thakurain Sri Nath Kuar will be the owner of the entire taluqa and all the moveable and immoveable properties etc., mentioned above as the widow of the Hindu family provided she leads a moral life. Thakurain Saheba aforesaid shall have no right to transfer the immoveable property. Till the life-time of Thakurain aforesaid no other person shall have any right of any sort in the said property."

The next paragraph in the will is to the effect that after the death of Thakurain Saheba the entire prope










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top