SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(All) 51

MOOTHAM, MUKERJI, MEHROTRA
Jagannath – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue, U. P. Allahabad – Respondent


Advocates:
B.L. Dikshit, for Petitioner; S.N. Singh, A.G. and S.C., for Opposite Parties.

Judgement

MOOTHAM, C. J.:- Two questions have been referred to this Full Bench for decision. The circumstances in which the reference has been made are these:

2. In 1950 or early in 1951 the petitioner, who was the tenant-in-chief of a certain plot of land, filed a suit under S.180, U.P. Tenancy Act, 1939, (hereinafter referred to as the Tenancy Act) for the ejectment of the third respondent on the ground that he was a trespasser. On 11-5-1951, the petitioner obtained a decree, and thereafter in execution of his decree he recovered possession of the plot. The third respondent appealed, but before his appeal could be heard a vesting order to take effect from 1-7-1952, was made under S.4, U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, (hereinafter referred to as the Act or the Zamindari Abolition Act) which came into force on 26-1-1951.

3. The Act abolished the zamindari system and made far reaching changes in the system of land tenure. Under S.20 those persons who on the date immediately preceding the date of vesting, that is on 30-6-1952, were inter alia recorded as occupants of any land (other than grove land or land to which S.16 applied) in the khasra or khatauni of 1356 Fasl





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top