SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(All) 87

MOOTHAM, H. S. CHATURVEDI
Mata Badal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Bijay Bahadur Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
R.B. Chaudhri, for Appellants; B.K. Dhaon, for Respondents Nos. 1 and 2.

Judgement

H.S. CHATURVEDI, J. :- This special appeal by the plaintiffs arises out of a suit for possession. The facts of the case are not disputed. One Ram Harakh Singh was the last male owner of the property which is involved in this suit. In the year 1916, he was murdered by his first two cousins, namely Ram Anand Singh and Ram Narain Singh, sons of Chandika Singh real brother of Ram Harakh Singhs father. Both the brothers, that is, Ram Anand Singh and Ram Narain Singh were prosecuted and ultimately convicted under S. 304, I.P.C.

2. On the death of Ram Harakh Singh, his widow succeeded to the estate of her husband as a Hindu widow, and in that capacity she remained in possession of her husbands property till her death in 1933. She was survived by her daughter, Menda Kaur, but she could not succeed because of a family custom which excluded daughters from inheritance. Ram Anand Singh and Ram Narain Singh were in possession of the property of Ram Harakh Singh when this suit was filed in 1945 by Maharaja Singh and his transferees.

In the pedigree of the family, Maharaja Singh belongs to the line of Gajgah Singh while Ram Anand Singh and Ram Narain Singh who were impleaded as defendants



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top