SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(All) 535

RAN VIJAI SINGH
RAMESH – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR JALAUN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
U.K. Mishra and A.K. Mishra for the Petitioners; C.S.C., D D Chauhan and V.K. Singh for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Ran Vijai Singh, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel and learned counsel for the gaon sabha.

2. Through this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for issuing a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 29.4.1999 passed by respondent No. 1 in revision No. 10 of 1997-98 (Daryav and others v. Gaon Sabha) as well as order dated 27.2.1998 passed by respondent No. 2 in case No. 217 of 1997 filed under Section 122-B of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. It appears, for encroachment over gata No. 1086, which is recorded as khalihan, notices were issued to the petitioners on Form 49-A for removal of encroachment of 90 square meter land. The petitioners have filed their objection denying the encroachment over the said land. The Tehsildar vide order dated 27.2.1998 has found the petitioners as unauthorized encroacher over the gaon sabha land and imposed damages of Rs. 2,500/-.

3. Aggrieved by the order dated 27.2.1998, passed by the Tehsildar, petitioners herein filed a revision under Section 333 of the Act, which was barred by time. Petitioners have also filed an application for condonation of delay. The Distric






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top