SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 1072

S. B. SINHA
Apangshu Mohan Lodh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Tripura – Respondent


ORDER

The appellants herein belong to legal profession and are practising advocates. They were appointed as Part-Time Lecturers in M.B.B. College, Agartala on a fixed pay. The appellants filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Gauhati High Court, Agartala Bench, for issuance of a writ or in the nature of mandamus to the respondents to accord unto them proportionate equal pay for equal work, for working as Part-Time Lecturers. A learned Single Judge of the High Court accepted the plea of the appellants herein and allowed the petition. Aggrieved, the respondent-State of Tripura preferred a Letters Patent Appeal before a Division Bench of the High Court. There was a delay of 460 days in filing the appeal and, therefore, the State of Tripura filed an application for condonation of delay. The Division Bench of the Gauhati High Court condoned the delay in filing the appeal and upon hearing the parties allowed the same. Consequently the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge was set aside. Aggrieved, the appellants are in appeal before us.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants urged that since filing of Letters Patent Appeal was grossly delayed an













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top