SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(All) 2636

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Before : Ashok Bhushan and Vipin Sinha, JJ.
Shiv Kumar Pathak and others .....Appellants
Versus
State of U.P. and others ....Respondents
(Special Appeal Defective No. 237 of 2013 with Special Appeal Nos. 150, 159, 152, 149, 161, 205, 206, 220, 244, 246, 248, 249, 261, 262, 264, 265, 266, 268, 307, 333 of 2013, Special Appeal Defective Nos. 200, 227, 228, 302, 672, 697, 698 of 2013 and Special Appeal No. 1736 of 2013, decided on 20th November, 2013)

Advocates:
Counsel :
V.K. Singh, G.K. Singh, Abhishek Srivastava, Asheesh Mani Tripathi, Shashi Nandan, Siddharth Khare, Ashok Khare, Sadanand Mishra, Seemant Singh, Navin Kumar Sharma, Shailendra, Pankaj Lal, Indra Raj Singh, Kshetresh Chandra Shukla, Manoj Kumar Dubey, Alok Mishra, Vijay Shankar Tripathi, Vinod Shankar Tripathi, Hemant Kumar Rai, Jagdish Pathak, R.K. Mishra, G.K. Mishra, Murtuza Ali, Irshad Ali, Vijay Chaurasia, Neeraj Tiwari, Laxmi Narain Mishra for the Appellants; C.S.C., A.K. Yadav, Bhanu Pratap Singh, C.B. Yadav, Shyam Krishna Gupta, R.A. Akhtar, B.P. Singh, Mrigraj Singh, S. Nadeem Ahmad, Ram Chandra Singh, R.B. Pradhan, Sanjay Chaturvedi, Y.S. Bohar, H.K. Yadav, Ayank Mishra, Ashok Kumar for the Respondents.

Headnote:U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981—Rules 14 and 8 (As amended by Twelfth Amendment Rules, 2011)—Constitution of India, 1950—Articles 14, 21-A and 45—Right of Children to Free And Compulsory Education Act, 2009—Sections 8(a) and 23—National Council for Teachers Education Act, 1993—Section 12—Selection—Teachers—B.Ed. Candidates—Effect of 12th Amendment Rules—Appellants possessing B.Ed. qualification—Sought such appointment on the basis of marks obtained in Teachers Eligibility Test—Since criteria for selection cannot be changed after start of selection process nor there was sufficient reason for not proceeding with the selection advertised on 30.11.2011—However, Single Judge denied relief to appellants only on the ground that there being no cadre of ‘Trainee Teacher’ under 1981 Rules, impugned advertisement dated 30.11.2011 was itself invalid—Challenge against—Whether 1981 Rules are applicable to B.Ed. candidates? Whether 15th (Amendment) Rules dated 31.8.2012 and G.O. dated 31.8.2012 were in accordance with law? 1981 Rules read with the notification dated 23.8.2010 issued under Section 23 (1) and guidelines dated 11.2.2011 issued by National Council for Teacher Education are fully applicable for appointment of Assistant Teachers in pursuance of impugned notification dated 30.11.2011—Impugned notification did not contemplated the appointment of trainee teacher—Guidelines dated 11.2.2011 as issued by the National Council for Teacher Education are binding on the State—Decision of State Government to change the criteria for selection as prevalent prior to 12th amendment rules was not in accordance with law—G.O. dated 26.7.2011, insofar as it directs for restoration of criteria for selection as was prevalent prior to 12th Amendment Rules set aside—15th Amendment Rules insofar as Rule 14(3) is concerned declared ultra vires—Directions issued. [Paras 33 to 89]

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Ashok Bhushan, J.—All these special appeals filed against the same judgment of learned Single Judge dated 16.1.2013 being connected, have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment. The appellants possessing B.Ed. qualification and Teachers Eligibility Test had applied against 72,825 posts of Teachers of primary schools advertised on 30.11.2011, which selection was to take place on the basis of marks obtained in Teachers Eligibility Test, filed the writ petitions challenging the decision of the State Government by which Teachers Eligibility Test was decided to be only a minimum qualification and not the basis of selection. The petitioners had also prayed for completion of selection process on the basis of advertisement dated 30.11.2011. Learned Single Judge although held that neither criteria for selection can be changed after start of selection process nor there was sufficient reason for not proceeding with the selection advertised on 30.11.2011, denied the relief to the petitioner-appellants only on the ground that there being no cadre of ‘Trainee Teacher’ under the U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981, the advertisement dated 30.11.2011 itself was invalid. The appellants aggrieved by the judgment of learned Single Judge have come up in these appeals.

Facts:

2. The background facts giving rise to filing of the writ petitions need to be noted for deciding the issues, which have arisen for consideration in this bunch of special appeals. U.P. Basic Education Board constituted under the U.P. Basic Education Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as ‘1972 Act’) is running various junior basic schools and Senior basic schools from classes I to VIII. The criteria and procedure for selection is regulated by the U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981 framed under the 1972 Act. For achieving planned and co-ordinated development of the teacher education system throughout the country and for the regulation and proper maintenance of norms and standards in the teacher education system and for matters connected therewith, the National Council for Teachers Education Act, 1993 was enacted by Parliament (hereinafter referred to as 1993 Act). The Right of Education having been recognised as a fundamental right under the Constitution of India and the State being responsible to provide free and compulsory education to the children up to 6 to 14 years, Parliament enacted the Right of Children to Free And Compulsory Education Act, 2009. Under Section 23 of 2009 Act the National Council for Teacher Education has been authorised by the Central Government to lay down minimum qualifications for appointment of teachers. The National Council For Teacher Education vide notification dated 23.8.2010 laid down various qualifications for appointment of teachers. Passing of Teachers Eligibility Test has been laid down as one of the qualifications, which is to be possessed by a candidate for appointment as a teacher. Under clause 3 of the notification dated 23.8.2010, candidates having B.Ed. qualification have also been treated as eligible provided they are imparted six months’ special training programme in the elementary education. On 11.2.2011, the National Council For Teacher Education issued guidelines for conduct of Teachers Eligibility Test which further provides for giving weightage to the marks of the Teachers Eligibility Test in the recruitment of teachers. On 9.11.2011, 1981 Rules were amended by 12th Amendment Rules incorporating passing of Teachers Eligibility Test as one of the minimum qualifications in the 1981 Rules. Rule 14(3) as amended further provides that selection shall be made on the basis of marks in the Teachers Eligibility Test. On 13.11.2011 Board of Highschool and Intermediate Education U.P. conducted the Teachers Eligibility Test examination in which several lacs of candidates participated. On 25.11.2011 result of Teachers Eligibility Test was declared. All the appellan




































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top