RAJES KUMAR, MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI
BALRAJ SINGH BHADAURIA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble Rajes Kumar, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.N. Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4.
2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 1.2.2013 passed by the Regional Manager, Sarva U.P. Gramin Bank, 803/B-1, Gwalior Road, Jhansi as well as order dated 3.10.2013 passed by the Secretary Board, Sarva U.P. Gramin Bank, Head Office, Jhansi.
3. It appears that the petitioner has been punished by order dated 28.5.2003 and he has been terminated from the service against which appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed vide order dated 4.9.2003. The petitioner has not challenged the aforesaid two orders further and the aforesaid two orders have attained finality.
4. It appears that the petitioner has been acquitted in criminal proceeding vide order dated 29.2.2012. After the acquittal, the petitioner moved an application on 6.8.2012 for reinstatement, which has been refused vide order dated 1.2.2013, which is being challenged in the writ petition.
5. We do not find any merit in the writ petition.
6. Admittedly, the petitioner has not challenged the punishment order and th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.