SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(All) 2652

RAKESH TIWARI, BHARAT BHUSHAN
MATIVAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
SECRETARY (AGRICULTURE) – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
B.C. Naik for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Bharat Bhushan, J.—The petitioner Mativar Singh, was punished vide order dated 27.4.2001 pursuant to the departmental enquiry initiated after eleven years, for theft of official vehicle (jeep) allotted to him in his official capacity.

2. Brief facts leading to the present writ petition are that one official vehicle No. UMV 2687 was allotted to the petitioner in his official capacity of Sub-divisional Agriculture Extension Officer, Azamgarh with official driver. Since there was no ‘Garage’ in the campus of office, the driver used to park the said vehicle in front of office. An office clerk namely Sri Bhairo Prasad and a Chowkidar Sri Chandrabali Yadav as well as the jeep driver Bhuneshwar Kant used to reside in office. Keys of the said jeep were kept by the Jeep Driver Bhuneshwar Kant.

3. The petitioner contends that he fell sick during official tour on 23.3.1989, therefore, he went on leave for 24.3.1988 with oral permission of Deputy Director of Agriculture. The said official vehicle was stolen during the night of 24/25-03-1988 when petitioner was neither present in the office nor at his residence situate at Lalganj Bazar, Azamgarh as he had gone out to Varanasi fo














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top