SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(All) 2784

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, SANJAY MISRA
MADHYAMIK VIDHYALAYA PRABHANDHAN SAMITI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Gopal Misra for the Appellant; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—On 31 October 2012, the Secretary (Secondary Education), Government of Uttar Pradesh issued a Government Order defining the norms for the allotment of examination centres for the year 2013. Clause 1(ka) in the Government Order stipulated that for the examinations for academic year 2013, those institutions which had conducted the Board examinations for 2012 in a peaceful manner, would mandatorily be allotted examination centres. On 9 October 2013, a fresh Government Order has been issued by the Secretary (Secondary Education). Clause 1(ka), as modified, specifies that for academic year 2014, those institutions which had conducted the Board examinations for 2013 in a peaceful manner would ordinarily be allotted examination centres.

2. In a challenge to the modification which has been brought out for 2014, the learned Single Judge by the impugned judgement and order dated 12 November 2013 has found no reason to interfere. The learned Single Judge held that it is for the Government to frame a policy and the Court should not normally interfere with a policy decision merely because it feels that another policy would have been fairer or wiser or logical. However, the





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top