SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 250

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, DILIP GUPTA
PARMI MAURYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
M.A. Ausaf and Ashok Khare for the Appellant; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—This special appeal arises from a judgement of the learned Single Judge dated 24 September 2013.

2. The appellant applied for and was appointed on 4 January 1990 on the post of Health Worker (Female). The appellant claims to have completed the A.N.M. course at the A.N.M. Training Centre, Azamgarh in 1989. According to the appellant, the mark sheets were issued in the year 1989 and a training certificate was issued by the Secretary, U.P. State Medical Health and Family Welfare Faculty on 9 August 1993. A notice to show-cause was issued to the appellant on 29 October 2010 intimating her that the documents which were submitted by the appellant had been examined by the Medical Faculty and were found to be fabricated. The appellant was called upon to submit documentary evidence for verification within a period of three days. The appellant has averred that in pursuance of the notice to show-cause, she appeared before the Chief Medical Officer, Chitrakoot (second respondent) and produced the original certificate/training certificate which were scrutinised by the second respondent. On 30 November 2010, an order of termination was passed by the second respondent. The o














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top