Hon’ble Ran Vijai Singh, J.—Heard Sri Yashwant Varma, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Rohan Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents and learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha.

2. The amendment application is allowed. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to amend the writ petition during the course of the day.

3. In substance, the petitioner appears to be aggrieved by the order dated 31.1.2014 passed by the Chief Revenue Officer in revision No. 16/27 of 2013-14 (Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd. v. State and others) by which the petitioner’s application, seeking stay of the operation of the order dated 16.12.2013 passed by the Tehsildar/Assistant Collector in case Nos. 186/410 of 2013, 411 of 2013, 433 of 2013 and 256 of 2013 (Report Lekhpal v. Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.), has been rejected. vide order dated 16.12.2013, the proceeding initiated against the petitioner under Section 122-B of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (in short ‘the Act’) has been allowed ex parte without there being any version of the petitioner. Challenging this order, the petitioner