A.P.SEN, K.N.SINGH
Sirsilk LTD. : Century Spinning And Manufacturing Company LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Textiles Committee – Respondent
JUDGMENT
SEN, J. :— In all these appeals except the, one by special leave, and the connected transferred cases brought by the appellants, each of which is a company incorporated .under the Companies Act, 1956 engaged in the business of manufacture and sale on a very large scale of textiles generally and also of rayon yarn and staple fibre, both of which form species of what is known as man made fibre i.e. artificial silk, there is a common question as to the constitutional validity of a fee imposed under R. 21 of the Textiles Committee Rules, 1965 made by the Central Government under S. 22 of the Textiles Committee Act, 1963, by the Textiles Committee constituted under S. 3 of the Act, on the production of rayon yarn and staple fibre i.e. man made fibres manufactured by them. These appeals are against the various judgments and orders of the High Courts of Allahabad, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat and Madras upholding the validity of the levy. The remaining appeal i.e. Civil Appeal No. 121 of 1973 is preferred by the Textiles Committee against the judgment and order of the Kerala High Court taking the view to the contrary.
2. The facts in all these cases are more or less similar. It would s
Sreenivasa General Traders v. State of A. P.
M/s Amar Nath Om Parkash v. State of Punjab
City Corporation of Calicut v. Thachambalath Sadalinan
I. T. C. Ltd. v. State of Karnataka
Om Parkash Agarwal v. Giri Raj Kishori
Commisnioner, H. R. E. v. Sri Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar of Sri Shirur Mutt
Hingir-Rampur Coal Co. Ltd. v. State of Orissa
Southern Pharmaceuticals and Chemicals, Trichur v. State of Kerala
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.