SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(All) 444

SATISH CHANDRA, K. C. AGRAWAL
Commissioner Of Income-Tax – Appellant
Versus
Kunji Lal Dhanpat Rai – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
A. Gupta, G.C. Dwivedi

JUDGMENT

Satish Chandra, C.J.

1. THE assessee is a registered firm carrying on business of commission agent for handloom cloth at Maunnath Bhanjan, in the District of Azamgarh. It claimed that its customers came to Maunnath Bhanjan from various parts of the country to make purchases through it. The assessee had to provide them with meals when they stayed at Maunnath Bhanjan. The expenditure incurred by way of entertainment of serving tea, pan, etc., was claimed as an allowable expenditure. The ITO, however, repelled it in view of s. 37(2) of the I.T. Act for the assessment year in question, namely, 1973-74. On appeal, the assessee's claim was accepted. The Tribunal agreed with the AAC. The Tribunal has referred the following question for our opinion :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the expenditure of Rs. 13,591 incurred by the assessee comes within the mischief of Section 37(2A) of the I.T. Act, 1961 ?"

2. IN Brij Raman Dass and Sons v. CIT [1976] 104 ITR 541 (All), this court has held that expenditure in providing refreshments to customers was an entertainment expenditure and hence not allowable. Further, in CIT v. Manoo Ram Ram Karan Dass [I.T.R. No 19


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top