SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(All) 24

K. JAGANNATHA SHETTY, D. N. JHA
Satyendra Prasad Jain – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate appeared:
Ambrish Sharma

JUDGMENT

K. J. Shetty, C. J.

1. Petitioners are the owners of a land measuring about 26 Bighas. It is situated in village Baraut Patti Baru, Pargana Baraut, in district Meerut. This land alongwith other lands measuring about 60 more Bighas is being acquired for construction of a market yard of Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, Baraut.

2. On July 29, 1986, a notification under sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act (called shortly "The Act") was issued. The notification states that the Governor was satisfied that in view of the present urgency it was necessary to eliminate the delay likely to be caused by an enquiry under section 5-A of the Act, and consequently the Governor was pleased to direct under subsection (4) of Section 17 that the provision of section 5-A of the Act shall not apply to the proposed acquisition. ON October 24, 1986 the declaration under section 6 of the Act was issued. The petitioners have challenged the validity of the acquisition in particular, the legality of dispensing with the requirements of the provision of section 5-A of the Act.

The case of the petitioners is that there is absolutely no urgency for acquisition by eliminating the enquiry c


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top