SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 1429

RAN VIJAI SINGH
Dodram – Appellant
Versus
Collector, Pilibhit – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Vijay Krishna Majumdar for the Petitioner; C.S.C. and Amresh Singh for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Ran Vijai Singh, J.—Heard Sri Vijay Krishna Majumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents and Sri Amresh Singh, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha.

2. Through this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for issuing a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 20.2.2014 passed by the Assistant Collector First Class/Tehsildar Sadar, Pilibhit, District Pilibhit in Case No. 39/2013-14 (Gaon Sabha v. Dodram) and the order dated 8.8.2014 passed by the Collector, Pilibhit in case No. D2014125600497 (Doodram v. Gram Samaj).

3. vide order dated 20.2.2014 the proceeding initiated by the Gaon Sabha under Section 122-B of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) being Case No. 39/2013-14 (Gaon Sabha v. Dodram) was allowed and the petitioner’s possession over the land in dispute was found to be unauthorised, therefore, an order of dispossession has also been passed after imposing damages of Rs. 1,440/- alongwith execution cost of Rs. 5/-. The revision filed by the petitioner against the the aforesaid order has been dismissed as barred by time vide order dated 8.8.201

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top