SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 1925

SUNEET KUMAR
VARUN GOPAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Ashish Agrawal for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Suneet Kumar, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Nimai Das, learned Standing Counsel.

2. The petitioner purchased half of the agricultural land through sale-deed No. 4374 on 24.8.2011 being Khasra No. 231 ad measuring 0.501 hectare i.e. 0.2505 hectare in Villega Gahri Tamna, Chungi Bazar, Hathras. On inspection report, stamp case No. 34 of 2011 was registered under Section 47-A of Indian Stamp Act 1899. The petitioner in his objection to the notice stated that the disputed property is an agricultural land and is used as such, there is no residential activity within 200 meters of property in question, further, no declaration under Section 143 of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act has been notified regarding the change of land use.

3. The Collector by order dated 22.1.2013, determined the stamp deficiency of Rs. 1,94,125/- and imposed penalty of equal sum alongwith interest @ 1.5% per month. Aggrieved, petitioner filed appeal No. 15/79 of 2012-13 before the respondent No. 2, Additional Commissioner (Stamp) Aligarh Division, Aligarh, which was rejected on 31.5.2013 on the ground that the property in question is situated in the vicinity of agricultural land being plot













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top