RAN VIJAI SINGH
MUKESH – Appellant
Versus
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE (FINANCE AND REVENUE), MATHURA – Respondent
Hon’ble Ran Vijai Singh, J.—Heard Sri Rajesh Dutta Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri B.B.Paul alongwith Sri A.P.Paul, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3.
2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for issuing a writ of certiorari quashing the orders dated 24.3.2015 passed by the Additional District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue) Mathura in Revision No. 18/2012-13/D2013015000328 (Mukesh and others v. Manjari Devi) and order dated 24.7.2013 passed by the Tehsildar Mahavan in Case No. 207 T.M./178 T.M. (Mukesh and others v. Doota).
3. vide order dated 24.7.2013, the orders dated 31.3.1994, 24.9.1994, 6.7.1995, 21.7.1995 and 19.8.2006 were set aside after condoning the delay and the restoration application dated 20.12.2007 seeking recall of the of the order dated 31.3.1994 was allowed. Whereas by the subsequent order dated 24.3.2015, revision filed by the petitioners, against the order dated 24.7.2013 passed by the Tehsildar, has been dismissed by the Additional District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue) Mathura.
4. While assailing the impugned orders, learned counsel for the petiti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.