SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 127

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, YASHWANT VARMA
STATE OF U. P. – Appellant
Versus
RAHUL – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Piyush Shukla for the Appellants; Vinod Kumar Singh for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Dr. Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chandrachud, C.J.—This special appeal has arisen from a judgment and order of the learned Single Judge dated 15 September 2015. The respondent applied in pursuance of an advertisement that was issued on 14 May 2013 by the Uttar Pradesh Police Recruitment and Promotion Board setting in motion a selection process for appointment of constables in the civil police and PAC among other posts. The selection process envisaged four stages namely : (i) Physical Standard Test; (ii) Physical Efficiency Test; (iii) Written Test; and (iv) a Medical Test. The respondent was invalidated on the ground of medical unfitness in the medical test which resulted in the filing of writ proceedings. In the writ petition, the respondent averred that he had been wrongly declared failed by the medical board whereas he had got himself examined by a doctor of VMMC and Safdarjang Hospital where he was found to be fit.

2. The learned Single Judge by an interim order dated 4 August 2015 directed the medical examination of the respondent upon appearing before the Principal of the Motilal Nehru Medical College who was to constitute a three-Member team for submitting a report. T




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top