Hon’ble Anil Kumar, J.—Heard Sri Umesh Chandra, learned Senior counsel assisted by Sri S.M.S. Royekwar, learned counsel for petitioner Sri Kabir Ahmad and Sri Anurag Srivastava, learned counsel for respondents and perused the record.

2. Owner/landlord Girish Dhan, owner-landlord of building No. 19, Gautam Budh Marg, P.S. Quiserbagh, Lucknow, bounded as under :

East	Latouche Road/Gauam	Budh Marg, Lucknow
West	Qaisergabh Sabzimandi
North	Amature building known as	Hamid Estate Building
South	Rasta of Qaisergagh Sabzi	Mandi

3. On 20.11.2011, landlord moved an application under Section 21(1) (a) of U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction Rules, 1972 in respect to first floor of the building comprising of one hall, two rooms, latrin, bathroom, kitchen and angan (hereinafter referred to as premises in dispute) under the tenancy of the petitioner on a monthly rent of Rs. 295/- on the ground that the landlord and his family members are residing in House No. 116/108, Ghasyari Mandi, P.S. Qaiserbagh, Lucknow, the ground floor of the house is occupied by different tenant and on the first floor of the aforesaid house, landlord/respondent No. 3 and his family members are residing. The accommodation available in the said house with the applicant/landlord comprising two rooms, Pooja Ghar, Baithak, Two stores, kitchen, angan, latrin and bathroom and the family of the applicant is as follows :

(i) Applicant who is a business man in the city of Lucknow

(ii) Wife of applicant. She is a house wife.

(iii) Sri Navin Dhan Das gupta son of applicant. He is doing business with the applicant.

(iv) Wife of Sri Navin Dhan Das Gupta. She is a housewife.

(v) Km. Ananya Gupta aged about 6 years daughter of Sri Navin Dhan Das Gupta. She is a student of Christ Church College, Lucknow

(vi) Km. Bhavya Gupta aged bout 4 years daughter of Sri Navin Dhan Das Gupta

(vii) Sri Nitin Dhan Das Gupta son of applicant. He is doing business with the applicant.

(viii) Wife of Sri Nitin Dhan Das Gupta.

4. So the premises under the tenancy of the petitioner is needed because the relationship between the wife of Sri Nitin Dhan Das Gupta is not cordial, due to this reason, the peace in the family of the applicant is disturbed. As such, the applicant/landlord decided to shift Sri Nitin Dhan Das Gupta and his wife from house 116/108, Ghaayari Mandi, P.S. Qaiserbagh, Lucknow to House No. 19 Gautam Budh Marg, P.S. Qaiserbagh, Lucknow i.e. in the premises in question. Sri Nitin Dhan Das Gupta and his wife are ready to reside in the premises in question, argued to vacate their present residential accommodation just to maintain peace in the family of the applicant. As such, the need of the applicant for the premises in question is genuine, bona fide and pressing one.

5. Accordingly, P.A. Case No. 80 of 2011 (Girish Dhan Das Gupta v. Sri Dharmendar Singh Sonkar) has been registered before prescribed authority/Fist Additional Judge Small Causes Court, Lucknow/respondent No. 2.

6. On 10.11.2012, petitioner, tenant filed his written statement to which applicant filed his replication on 7.8.2012. Prescribed authority/Fist Additional Judge Small Causes Court, Lucknow by order dated 19.11.2012 allowed the release application moved by the landlord under Section 21(1) (a) of U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction Rules, 1972.

7. Aggrieved by the same, petitioner filed a Rent Appeal No. 1300079/2012 (Dharment Singh Sonkar v. Girish Dhan Das Gupta), by order dated 18.12.2015, appellate authority, dismissed the appeal.

8. Sri Umesh Chandra, learned senior counsel for petitioner while challenging the impugned orders dated 18.12.2015 and 19.11.2012 passed by respondent Nos. 1 and 2 submits that the need of the tenant is more genuine and bona fide in comparison to need of the landlord. In order to elaborate