NARAYAN SHUKLA, ANANT KUMAR
ARVIND KUMAR RAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble Shri Narayan Shukla, J.—Heard Mr. Upendra Nath Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary, learned Additional Advocate General alongwith Mr. Ashutosh Singh, learned Standing Counsel as well as Mr. H.G.S. Parihar, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Rajendra Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4.
2. The petitioner being appointed on the post of Deputy Director, Panchayat Raj Department of the State Government has assailed an order dated 27.5.2016, whereby the State Government had created a post of Deputy Director (Technical) temporarily in the Pay Scale of Rs. 15600-39100/- with Grade Pay of Rs. 6600/- as also the order dated 3.6.2016, whereby the fourth respondent had been promoted on a newly created post i.e. Deputy Director (Technical).
3. The service conditions of the gazetted officers appointed in Zila Panchayat Monitoring Cell are governed under the Uttar Pradesh Zila Panchayat Monitoring Cell Gazetted Officer’s Service Rules, 2004 (Rules, 2004). Part-II of the Rules, 2004 deals with the cadre of service. Rule 4 of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.