Hon’ble Krishna Murari, J.—Heard Shri Neeraj Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 5 and Shri Sandeep Arora for respondent No. 3-Bank.

2. Admittedly, late father of the petitioner took two loans from respondent No. 3-Bank and mortgaged the property bearing khasra No. 762, area 1128 sq. ft. situated in Rudrapur and another residential plot Nos. 820 and 821, area 2128 sq. ft. as security to the said loans. The dispute in the present writ petition is in respect of the khasra No. 762. Late father of the petitioner defaulted in making repayment, as a result, proceedings under Section 13 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act, 2002’) was initiated. Notice under Section 13 (2) of the Act, 2002 was issued and subsequently after notice under Section 13 (4) of the Act, 2002, the respondent-Bank made an application under Section 14 of the Act, 2002 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate seeking assistance in taking possession of the secured asset. Chief Judicial Magistrate vide order dated 18.3.2016, impugned in this