SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 1490

RAN VIJAI SINGH
MUNNI LAL YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Niraj Tiwari for the Petitioner; C.S.C., Ramesh Chandra Upadhyay and Gautam for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Ran Vijai Singh, J.—Heard Sri Niraj Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents, Sri R.C.Upadhyay learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha and Sri Gautam, learned counsel for the respondent No. 7.

2. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:

“1. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certirorari quashing the impugned ex parte order dated 29.6.2016 passed by the Deputy District Magistrate, Martinganj, District Azamgarh i.e. respondent No. 2 on the report of concerned Gram Panchayat Adhikari for registration of names of the contesting respondent Nos. 7 to 10 in the family register of the petitioner’s family (Annexure 5 to this writ petition.

2. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No. 2 i.e. Deputy District Magistrate, Martinganj, District Azamgarh to recall the ex parte report and order dated 28.6.2016 and 29.6.2016 by deciding the petitioner’s recall application within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon’ble Court.

3. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No. 2 i.e. Deputy District Mag
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top