SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 1676

RAN VIJAI SINGH
SALMA KHATOON – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Sheo Shankar Tripathi and Adya Prasad Tewari for the Petitioner; C.S.C. and Tripathi B.G. Bhai for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Ran Vijai Singh, J.—Heard Sri Adya Prasad Tewari, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents and Sri Ramendra Asthana, alongwith Sri Tripathi B.G. Bhai, learned counsel for the caveator/complainant.

2. Through this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuing a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 12.8.2016 passed by the District Magistrate, Sant Kabir Nagar, by which the petitioner’s financial power has been ceased and simultaneously, the direction has been issued to the Sub Divisional Officer/Tehsildar, Mehdawal, District Sant Kabir Nagar to recover an amount of Rs. 55,449/- and deposit the same in the nodal A/c No. 4101000100047352 of Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (in short, MANREGA’), in Punjab National Bank, Khalilabad under Section 27 of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 (in short, ‘the Act’).

3. The impugned order has been challenged on the following grounds:

(1) the preliminary inquiry was not conducted as per Rule 2 of the U.P. Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhans, Up-Pradhans and Members) Enquiry Rules, 1997 (in short, ‘the Rules of 1997’); and

(2) assuming, for the












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top