SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 378

MANOJ MISRA
SHAILENDRA SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
AMIT BANSAL – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Prem Chand Jain for the Revisionists; Pramod Jain for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Manoj Misra, J.—Both these revisions have been filed by the defendants of S.C.C. Suit No. 5 of 2012 (herein after referred to as the suit). The suit was instituted by Dr. Amit Bansal (plaintiff-respondent) against Sri Shailendra Sharma and Sri Satish Paliwal (defendant-revisionists). As both the revisions arise out of the said suit and are between same set of parties, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties they were heard together and are being decided by a common judgment.

2. The suit was instituted by plaintiff-respondent against the defendant-revisionists for eviction of the defendants from an accommodation bearing No. 3/19-A/1, situated at Sitakunj, Nagla Padi, behind Civil Courts compound, Hari Parvat, Agra comprising one big hall (26' x 42') on lower ground floor; one room (10' x 12') adjacent to old pucca well on lower ground floor; one room (10' x 14') over it on upper ground floor; and four rooms with open space on upper ground floor. Apart from ejectment decree, money decree of Rs. 5,05,800/- alongwith future and pendente lite interest @ 18% per annum as well as mesne profits, damages for use and occupation at the rate of Rs. 40,000/- per mont




























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top