BHARATI SAPRU, SIDDHARTH
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
SYED QZAIR AHMAD – Respondent
Hon’ble Siddharth, J.—Heard Shri Sushil Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Vikas Budhwar, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1‘.
2. The above noted writ petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for quashing of the impugned order dated 30.4.2002 passed by the respondent No. 2, Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad in O.A. No. 888 of 1995.
3. By the aforesaid order tribunal has directed the petitioners to grant the grade pay-scale of Rs. 1600-2660 to the respondent No. 1 for the post of Head Coaching Clerk with effect from the date he was posted on that post instead of the pay-scale of Rs. 1400-2300 granted to him pursuant to medical de-categorison.
4. The brief facts of the petition are that while respondent No. 1 was working as Assistant Yard Master in Railway at Allahabad in the pay-scale of Rs. 1600-2600, he was medically de-categorised on 18.12.1992 due to constant decline in the eyesight standards. The respondent No. 1 attributed this decline due to constant and round the clock strenuous work of the petitioners. At the time of de-categorisation respondent No. 1 was drawing the pay-scale of Rs. 1600-2660 and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.