SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 1202

TARUN AGARWALA, ASHOK KUMAR
PAWAN KUMAR MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
JOINT DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J.—We have heard Sri Shashi Nandan, the learned senior Advocate alongwith Sri A.K.Singh, the learned counsel for the appellant and Sri S.B.Singh, the learned counsel for the Committee of Management and the learned standing counsel for the State.

2. The facts as has been culled out from the pleadings is, that one post of Senior Clerk and one post of Junior Clerk became vacant in Sri Ganga Prasad Inter College, Jagdishpur, Azamgarh. The Committee of Management resolved to fill up the vacancies. The vacancies were advertised and applications were invited. The appellant alongwith respondent No. 5 and others applied and the Selection Committee recommended a list in which respondent No. 5 was placed at Sl.No. 1 and the appellant was placed at Sl.No. 2. An appointment order was issued in favour of respondent No. 5. It was alleged that respondent No. 5 expressed his inability to join, on the basis of which the Committee of Management issued another letter of appointment dated 8.2.2007 in favour of the petitioner who accepted the appointment letter and joined on 12.2.2007. After the issuance of the appointment letter the institution forwarded the papers to th




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top