Back
D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, P. K. S. BAGHEL
Awnindra Nath – Appellant
Versus
District Inspector of School Jaunpur – Respondent
Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel, J.
A petition had been filed by the appellant in 1992 challenging an order passed by the District Inspector of Schools, Jaunpur on 1 July 1992 discontinuing his engagement as an ad hoc employee.
2. It appears from the records that on 14 July 1992, a learned Single Judge had, by an interim direction, stayed the operation of the order dated 1 July 1992 and directed that the appellant shall continue on the post and will obtain salary in accordance with law till further orders of the Court or until a regularly selected candidate joins the post.
3. The petition was dismissed for non prosecution on 15 July 2014. The appellant filed an application for recall of the order dated 15 July 2014 on 7 August 2014, stating that when the petition was called out, his Advocate, who was suffering from fever was consulting a Doctor in the clinic situated in the High Court Campus and that in the meantime, the matter was dismissed for want of prosecution. When the recall application came up before the learned Single Judge, it was dismissed by the impugned order dated 4 September 2014. The learned Single Judge passed the following order:
“Heard learned counsel for the pet
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
