Anil Kumar,J.

Heard Dr. L.P. Misra, learned counsel for the review petitioner and perused the record.

By means of the present review petition, the petitioner has prayed for review of the judgment and order dated 27.11.2013 passed by this Court in writ petition no. 3198 (SS) of 2003 (Dr. Sursari Tarang Misra vs. U.P. Sainik School Society and Ors.)

2. Initially, Dr. Sursari Tarang Misra approached this Court by filing Writ Petition No.3198 (SS) of 2003 with the prayer that an advertisement dated 1.3.2000 has been published in the daily newspaper i.e. Dainik Jagaran for regular appointment on various posts in the Institution known as U.P. Sainik School, Sarojini Nagar, Lucknow.

3. In response to the said facts, the review petitioner appeared before the interview/selection committee for appointment on the post of Hindi Teacher. The said committee has recommended the petitioner for giving an ad-hoc appointment and on 1.7.2000, he was appointed as a Master in Hindi in the Institution (hereinafter referred to as the Institution). In the said capacity, he worked and discharged his duties uptill 10.5.2013. Thereafter, his services were terminated on the ground of contractual employee a