SUDHIR AGARWAL
Kripal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
Sudhir Agarwal, J.
1. This application under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as "Cr.P.C.") has been preferred with a sole prayer that Courts below be directed to consider bail application of applicants, on the same day, pursuant to first information report dated 10.10.2012 (Case Crime No. 217 of 2012) under Section 120B , 302, I.P.C.) registered at P.S. Rajabpur, District Amroha, in the light of decision of this Court in Smt. Amarawati and Anr. v. State of U.P., 2004 (57) ALR 390 : (2005 CriLJ 755 (All) as approved by Apex Court in Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh v. State of U.P., 2009 (3) ADJ 322 : (AIR 2009 SC (Supp) 2178). I am required to consider whether such an application under Section 482 , Cr.P.C. with the prayer, as aforesaid, is entertainable. The scope of Section 482 , Cr.P.C., as is evident from a bare reading of aforesaid provision, can be culled out from the provision itself, which reads as under:
"482. Saving of inherent powers of High Court.- Nothing in this Code shall be deemed to limit or affect the inherent powers of the High Court to make such orders as may be necessary to give effect to any order under this Code, or t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.