SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 2512

RAM SURAT RAM (MAURYA)
Sharda Prasad Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : R.S. Pandey and Rajshree Malviya
For the Respondents: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Ram Surat Ram (Maurya), J.

1. Heard Sri R.S. Pandey, for the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed for quashing the proceedings of Appeal No. 1132 of 2002 and orders of Settlement Officer Consolidation dated 7.8.2013 and Deputy Director of Consolidation dated 8.9.2014 passed in title proceeding in U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).

2. The dispute relates to basic consolidation year khata 105 consisting plot 309 (area 2-7-5 bigha) of village Puredurawa Uparwar, pargana Bhadohi, district Sant Ravidas Nagar Bhadohi, which was recorded in the name of Ram Adhar, father of respondents-4 and 5 (hereinafter referred to as the respondents). During consolidation, the petitioner and his brothers filed an objection claiming co-tenancy in the land in dispute. It is alleged that the parties appeared before Assistant Consolidation Officer on 29.11.1983, and entered into compromise in presence of two members of Consolidation Committee, which was signed by them and on its basis, the names of the petitioner and his brothers were directed to be recorded as co-tenants in the disputed land. Thereafter chak was carved out in the names of the petit














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top