SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 2999

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Dr. Dhananjaya Yashwant Chandrachud, CJ., Shri Narayan Shukla, J.
Sri Jain Dharm Parvardhani Sabha Daligan Lko.& Anr. - Appellant
Versus
State of U.P.Thru.Prin.Secy.Institutional & Ors. 6131(M/S)15 - Respondent
Special Appeal No. 524 of 2015
Decided On : 02-11-2015

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sandeep Dixit, Vijay Dixit.
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Apoorva Tewari.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the correct interpretation and application of Section 4-B of the Societies Registration Act, 1860, and the appropriate course of action when the Deputy Registrar's view is found to be erroneous.

Headnote:

Societies Registration Act - Renewal of Registration - Section 4-B

Fact of the Case:

The case involved the renewal of registration of a society under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, and the subsequent legal challenges regarding the list of members and amendments in the bye-laws.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Deputy Registrar erred in concluding that Section 4-B had no application, and held that the exercise carried out by the Registrar was indeed under Section 4-B. However, the court also found that the Deputy Registrar's view was erroneous and set aside the judgment of the Single Judge, remanding the proceedings back to the Deputy Registrar for fresh consideration.

Issues: The issues revolved around the correct interpretation and application of Section 4-B of the Societies Registration Act, 1860, and the validity of the actions taken by the Registrar and Deputy Registrar.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Deputy Registrar's view on the applicability of Section 4-B was erroneous, and the exercise carried out by the Registrar was deemed to be under Section 4-B. However, the court also determined that the appropriate action was to set aside the Deputy Registrar's order and remand the proceedings for fresh consideration.

Final Decision: The special appeal was allowed in part, setting aside the judgment of the Single Judge and remanding the proceedings back to the Deputy Registrar for re-examination in accordance with Section 4-B. The court also directed the Deputy Registrar to conclude the proceedings within a specified timeline and to convene a meeting of the general body for the election programme.

JUDGMENT

This special appeal has arisen from a judgment and order of the learned Single Judge dated 14 October 2015.

2. A body by the name of Sri Jain Dharm Parvardhani Sabha was initially registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 on 6 September 1972. The registration of the society was renewed on 24 September 1996 with effect from 10 October 1985 and was valid until 9 October 2000. Thereafter, after the lapse of thirteen years, an application for renewal of the registration was filed on 27 November 2013 and the registration of the society was renewed on 31 December 2013. The appellants filed an application for recall of the order, which was rejected by the Deputy Registrar on 11 December 2014. The first writ petition1 was filed before a learned Single Judge for challenging that order. Thereafter, the Registrar passed another order on 23 January 2015 accepting the list of members of the Committee of Management and allowing the amendments in the bye-laws which was the subject matter of the second writ petition2. During the pendency of the writ petition, an interim order was passed directing the Registrar/Deputy Registrar to decide upon the rival lists in respect of members of the general body and to finalize the list of members within a stipulated period. The general body, as finalized by the Registrar/Deputy Registrar, was thereafter directed to hold elections.

3. After the order of this Court dated 1 April, 2015, the Deputy Registrar finalized the list of members of the general body on 20 July 2015. This order was set aside on 29 July 2015 in Writ Petition No.4335 (M/S) of 2015 on grounds of the violation of the principles of natural justice and the proceedings were remanded back. Thereafter, the Registrar passed a fresh order, which was impugned before the learned Single Judge. The judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 14 October 2015 having been rendered, this special appeal has been filed.

4. The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition and issued directions for the Registrar/Deputy Registrar to call for a meeting of the general body within two weeks, so that the election programme could be re-scheduled.

5. Section 4-B was introduced into the Societies Registration Act, 1860 by U.P. Act 23 of 2013 and came into force with effect from 9 October 2013. Section 4-B reads as follows:

"4-B. (1) At the time of registration/renewal of a society, list of members of General Body of that society shall be filed with the Registrar mentioning the name, father's name, address and occupation of the members. The Registrar shall examine the correctness of the list of members of the General Body of such society on the basis of the register of members of the General Body and minutes book thereof, cash book, receipt book of membership fee and bank pass book of the society.

(2) If there is any change in the list of members of the General Body of the society referred to in sub-section (1), on account of induction, removal, registration or death of any member, a modified list of members of General Body, shall be filed with the Registrar, within one month from the date of change.

(3) The list of members of the General Body to be filed with the Registrar under this section shall be signed by two office bearers and two executive members of the society."

6. The Deputy Registrar was of the view that the amended provisions of Section 4-B had no application. The relevant part of the observations of the Deputy Registrar read as follows:

"lkslkbVh vf/kfu;e esa lekfo"V fd;k x;k /kkjk&4 ch dk izkfo/kku o"kZ vDVwcj 2013 ls ykxw fd;k x;k gSA mijksDr foospuk ds vuqlkj laLFkk dh lk/kkj.k lHkk ds lnL;ksa ds fu/kkZj.k dk le; o"kZ 1972 ls o"kZ 2000 ds e/; bafxr fd;k x;k gSA vr,o lks0 jft0 vf/k0 1860 ds uohu vaxhd`r fd;s x;s /kkjk&4 ch ds izkfo/kku dks orZeku izdj.k esa ykxw fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gksxk] D;ksafd mDr izkfo/kku ljdkjh xtV m0iz0 ds vlk/kkj.k xtV esa 9 vDVwcj 2013 dks izdkf'kr gS rFkk mDr izkfo/kku dk vuqefr fnukad 28 flrEcj 2013 dks egke








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top