SANGEETA CHANDRA
RAJENDRA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, PANJAB AND SIND BANK – Respondent
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for quashing of the order dated 18.12.2010 passed by the Assistant General Manager (PF), Punjab and Sind Bank, New Delhi and also praying for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to grant pensionary benefits to the petitioner in lieu of provident fund.
2. The petitioner was a clerk in Punjab and Sind Bank, in Branch Office, Railway Road, Ghaziabad and submitted an application of resignation on 24.8.2009, which was accepted by the Bank on 23.9.2009.
3. It is the case of the petitioner that since a memorandum of settlement between the Union of the Bank Employees and Managements of different banks was in the process of being finalised for introducing the Second Pension Option and persons like the petitioner, who was a Provident Fund optee, would in terms of the said settlement, if finalised be granted second option to apply for pension in lieu of Provident Fund, the petitioner was advised by the Bank to move a conditional application for voluntary retirement, but in the form of resignation as applications for voluntary retirement were no longer being accepted.
4. The application dated 24.8
Anil Kumar Gupta Vs. State of U.P. 2015 (10) ADJ 264 (DB)
Dinesh Chandra Sangma Vs. State of Assam AIR 1978 SC 17
Punjab National Bank Vs. P.K. Mittal AIR 1989 SC 1083
Reserve Bank of India & another Vs. Cecil Dennis Solomon & another
Sudhir Chandra Sarkar Vs. Tata iron & Steel Corporation Ltd. AIR 1984 SC 1064
Sheel Kumar Jain Vs. New Indian Assurance Company Ltd. AIR 2011 SC 2990
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.