J.J.MUNIR
MANGESH RAJBHAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble J.J. Munir, J.—Heard Sri Hari Bhawan, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Shyamdhar Yadav, learned AGA alongwith Sri Vivek Dubey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
2. This revision is directed against an order of Sri Mohd. Aslam, learned Sessions Judge, Ballia dated 25.10.2017 passed in Criminal Appeal (Juvenile) No. 56 of 2017 whereby the learned Sessions Judge has dismissed the appeal affirming an order dated 6.10.2017 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Ballia refusing bail to the revisionist in Case Crime No. 570 of 2017 under Sections 376, 506, IPC and Section 3/4 POCSO Act, P.S. Ubhaon, District Ballia.
3. The facts giving rise to the revision in brief are that a first information report was lodged on 9.5.2017 at about 17:45 hours by the informant Ramraj Rajbhar, a resident of village Sonadih, P.S. Ubhaon, District Ballia being a scribed information to the police carrying allegations that on 8.5.2017 at about 3:00 p.m. while his minor daughter (Muniya Kumari) aged about 10 years had gone to attend the call of nature, the accused Manglesh Rajbhar enticed her away, carried her off into a Gumati and ravished her. He gave her Rs. 5/- as
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.